|
20-01-2025 |
|
|
20-01-2025 |
Chennai Bench
| SN. | Court No. | Item | Case | Cause Title | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 30 | 289 | Metabion International AG Vs Trivitron Healthcare Pvt. Ltd | Yet to be Taken |
| 2 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 31 | 421 | Tip Top Furniture Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs CA Mahalingam Suresh Kumar, Liquidator of Tip Top Furniture Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. | Yet to be Taken |
| 3 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 32-38 | 6 | O. Arumugasamy Vs T.R Mills Pvt. Ltd. & 15 Ors. | Yet to be Taken |
| 4 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 39-42 | 11 | Anjana Sanghi & 2 Ors Vs 3A Capital Services Ltd & 11 Ors. | Yet to be Taken |
| 5 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 43-44 | 247 | Vijay Kumar Penmetsa, Erst. Director of Corporate Debtor Vs Dr. KV Srinivas, Liquidator of Veda Biofuel Ltd. & 3 Ors. | Yet to be Taken |
| 6 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 45-47 | 209 | Ganapathi Reddy & Anr. Vs Bhrugesh Ramachandra Amin, RP, Panyam Cements and Minerals Industries Limited & 3 Ors. | Yet to be Taken |
| 7 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 48 | 272 | Sumit Binani Vs V. Venkatachalam, RP of Raigarh Champa Rail Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Anr | Yet to be Taken |
| 8 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 49 | 297 | PPG Asian Paint Pvt Ltd Vs DSC Motor Pvt Ltd. | Yet to be Taken |
| 9 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 50 | 310 | Maharashtra Seamless Ltd Vs V. Venkatachalam, RP of United Seamless Tubulaar Pvt. Ltd. & 9 Ors | Yet to be Taken |
| 10 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 51 | 379 | V-Con Integrated Solution Pvt Ltd. Vs CA Uthukuli Venkata Rao Sujatha & 4 Ors | Yet to be Taken |
| 11 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 52 | 59 | SMS Foundation & Investment LLPRep by its Designated Partner Manish Kumar B Shah Vs J John Ohilvi, RP, Harsha Exito Engineering Pvt. Ltd | Yet to be Taken |
| 12 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 53-54 | 125 | Sutanu Sinha, Liquidator of IVRCL Ltd. Vs Litostroj Power D.O.O | Yet to be Taken |
| 13 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 55 | 94 | INTUC Union, Shree Ambika Sugars Ltd. & Anr. Vs Anurag Goel & Anr. | Yet to be Taken |
| 14 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 1-3 | 19 | Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd. Purasawalkam Branch Vs E. Santhanalakshmi Liquidator of Swastik Spinners (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr | Yet to be Taken |
| 15 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 04 | 472 | Comandur Parthasarathy Vs Suhasini Ashok B Erst. IRP & 4 Ors | Yet to be Taken |
| 16 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 05 | 345 | Dr. P. Mahalingam Vs Santhosh Hospitals Pvt. Ltd. through Liquidator, Deepa Venkat Ramani and 2 Ors. | Yet to be Taken |
| 17 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 6-7 | 367 | The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner/ Recovery Officer Vs Vaasan Medical Centre Pvt Ltd. & 4 Ors. | Yet to be Taken |
| 18 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 08 | 142 | Radhakumari Suspended Director & shareholder of Uthara Fashion Knitwear Ltd. Vs Stressed Asset Stabilization Fund (SASF) & Anr. | Yet to be Taken |
| 19 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 09 | 52 | Amit Sanghi & 2 Ors. Vs Sanghi SEZ Pvt. Ltd. & 13 Ors | Yet to be Taken |
| 20 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 10-13 | 166 | Rythm Jain Vs Atlanti Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. Rep by its Liquidator, Sujata Chattopadhyay | Yet to be Taken |
| 21 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 56-57 | 202 | L Madhusudhan Rao Vs State Bank of India Stressed Assets Management Branch | Yet to be Taken |
| 22 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 58 | 430 | SV Ramasamy Guarantor of Swastik Spinners (India) Pvt Ltd Vs Mr. S Muthuraju Erst. Liquidator of Swastik Spinners (India) Pvt Ltd & 2 Ors. | Yet to be Taken |
| 23 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 14 | 69 | Amit Sanghi & 2 Ors. Vs Sanghi Textiles Pvt. Ltd. & 10 Ors | Yet to be Taken |
| 24 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 15 | 65 | Amit Sanghi & 2 Ors. Vs Sanghi Textiles Pvt. Ltd. & 11 Ors. | Yet to be Taken |
| 25 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 16-25 | 112 | Gireesh Kumar Sanghi Vs S.K.K. Zippers &10 Ors | Yet to be Taken |
| 26 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 26 | 40 | PK Ramesh, Suspended Director of Call Express Construction (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs The India Cements Ltd. & Anr | Yet to be Taken |
| 27 | 1 (Chennai Bench) | 27-29 | 73 | Octopus Productions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Enforcement Directorate Through Joint Director, Hyderabad Zonal Office & 5 Ors | Yet to be Taken |
(a) Automatic update in every 10 seconds.
(b) There may be time gap in internet transmission. Exact status be confirmed at the concerned court.